The table represents the breakdown of cost structure, which is constructed based on the information of Zara case. What is the worst interpretation regarding the table below?

$\backslash$table$[[,$Representative Competitor,Zara$],[$Posted Selling Price,$100\mathrm{.}0,100\mathrm{.}0],[-$Markdown,$-10\mathrm{.}5,-2\mathrm{.}6],[$Retail Selling Price $($RSP$),=89\mathrm{.}5,=97\mathrm{.}4$