There is no limit on the delegation of legislative power after Mead. Chevron was re-interpreted through Mead, which now states that Chevron deference only applies when Congress delegated to the agency the interpretive authority carrying the force of law. This decision leaves agencies to promote more delegation of legislative power so their interpretations are valid in the courts. 

Judicial review is still necessary and critical in deciding whether the action of Congress and the agencies were reasonable. Action by an agency may seem reasonable to them, but someone may believe that they are the victim of an error. In such a case, it is crucial to review the case. Reasonable action is an action that is not arbitrary, not capricious, and within the scope of the statute. It is an action that is deemed an appropriate response to a cause. For example, in Mead, the U.S. Customs Service viewed their action of issuing a ruling letter to classify daily planners as diaries as reasonable enough, but Mead disagreed. Subsequently, the court ruled that the action was in fact unreasonable as the ruling letter was not preceded by notice and comment as under the Administrative Procedure Act, and do not carry the force of law.

 

Kindly add more points to above-stated description as well as elaborate more with the explanation

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Certainly here are some additional points and explanations to further elaborate on the topics youve discussed 1 Delegation of Legislative Power After the Mead decision the limits on the delegation of ... View the full answer