Question: There is obviously a different intent behind race-based classifications designed to remedy past harms as compared to race-based discrimination designed to exclude or harm others.
There is obviously a different intent behind race-based classifications designed to remedy past harms as compared to race-based discrimination designed to exclude or harm others. Yet, both types of classifications are still subject to strict scrutiny under current case law. Should there be a difference in how these types of classifications are treated? Why or why not? Please support your views with examples from the cases in your reading.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
