This assignment asks you to begin to apply what you've just read in So What? and also the course pages below: - Not All Sources Are Alike - Avoiding Confirmation Bias - Fact Versus Opinion - Bias Vs. Point of View - How to Spot Bias-In Others and In Yourself Be sure you've read these before starting this assignment. We'll continue to explore Rosen's text-which, just to make sure everybody is clear, is unequivocally unbiased. However, is it possible that another reader, perhaps one unfamiliar with the concepts you just read, would misinterpret or mislabel the text as biased? If so, why might they do this? Every author holds opinions that impact his or her discussion of an issue, opinions that you as a reader must try to recognize and understand. However, a reader's blindness toward opinions, interpretations, and analysis actually opens the door for bias, simplistic thinking, and misunderstanding important issues. Opinions don't automatically equal bias and a biased opinion doesn't always impact credibility. Each text must be assessed on its own. Consider how one reader's context that could interfere with their comprehension when reading a text like Rosen's. Describe as hypothetical reader's context (it may help to think of context here as an experience, bias, or worldview this reader brings to the table) and how that context might interfere with accurately interpreting the text. Be sure to connect this hypothetical reader's context with specific elements of Rosen's text. Aim for at least 750 words. This assignment is somewhat more difficult than the others-you're beginning to adapt and apply critical thinking skills to a concept that requires some nuanced thought