This case primarily involves an implied contract $.$ When a contract's writing is clear and unequivocal, the court will enforce the contract according to its implied terms. Interpreting a contract's terms from the written document alone is sometimes referred to as the select answer $,.$ If a contract term is ambiguous, a court may consider select answer $,$ to interpret the contract.

In this case, the meaning of the word "chicken" is Therefore, a court

select answer use extrinsic evidence to interpret the contract between Freight and L$.$D$.$T$.$ The extrinsic evidence shows that the term "chicken" was given a select answer interpretation by the parties. Therefore, the extrinsic evidence of the contract favors the interpretation of select answer

In this case, seller L$.$D$.$T$.$ select answer satisfy the terms of the contract by delivering both older stewing and younger broiling chickens to Freight.

A court in this case likely select answer $,$ find that L$.$D$.$T$.$ did not breach the contract when it delivered both older stewing and younger broiling chickens to Freight. As a result,

select answer

would likely win the case.