This is assistance in a case study.

Relevant links are: https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/woolies-bottles-it-on-pokies-and-gives- customers-what-they-want-20190705-p524da.html

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-03/woolworths-to-pull-the-plug-on-pokies-and- pubs/11273802

First, what is a social contract and what are the explicit and implied terms of the social contract between woolworths and the community?

Which main stateholders may have lobbied Woolworths to exit the pokies / alcohol business, and please explain the likely motivations of these stakeholder groups.

Using Legitimacy Theory and the social contract, explain how this theory and concept apply to this case. What had been the possible issues and problems faced by Woolworths in the past? What are the consequences that Woolworths would have to bear if they continue to ignore the expectations of the community? What likely benefits will Woolworths achieve if they carry out their proposed actions?

What legitimation strategies can Woolworths adopt to enhance their standing in the community. Describe your strategies citing relevant sources and give reasons why these are appropriate.