Question: This is the last question with options If greater height was an advantage, then taller candidates should have won exactlymore thanless than 50% of the
This is the last question with options If greater height was an advantage, then taller candidates should have won exactlymore thanless than 50% of the elections. In this case, greater height appearsdoes not appear to be an advantage for presidential candidates because the confidence interval doesdoes not include 50%. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^PRESIDENT HEIGHT HEIGHT OPPTruman 175 173Eisenhower 179 178Coolidge 178 180Hayes 173 178G. W. Bush 183 185Polk 173 185Harrison 168 180F. Roosevelt 188 182Taylor 173 174J. Adams 170 189Van Buren 168 180Nixon 182 180Clinton 188 188Harding 183 178Wilson 180 182Harrison 173 168Pierce 178 196T. Roosevelt 178 175Jackson 185 171G. H. W. Bush 188 173

Refer to the data set of 20 randomly selected presidents given below. Treat the data as a sample and find the proportion of presidents who were taller than their opponents. Use that result to construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the population percentage. Based on the result, does it appear that greater height is an advantage for presidential candidates? Why or why not? :Click the icon to view the table of heights. Construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the percentage of presidents who were taller than their opponents. %
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
