This week, we return to our case studies to apply some of the principles and insights of Week 5 on Condentiality and Truthfulness. Using what you have learned from this week's readings, share your thoughts on the below case study. Dr. Timorous has been requested to examine Sonia and Stan Koska to see if there is any danger of them having children with Tay-Sachs, a genetic disease leading to meta] and physical deterioration. Over a period of months, a baby born with this disease will go blind, suffer from motor paralysis, spasticity, and, nally, rigidity of the muscles. Death occurs in the third year of life. The test indicates that Stan has a recessive TaySachs gene. Dr. Timorous tells him this and suggests that he tell his brothers and urge them to have the test, since they too are thinking of having children. Stan feels contaminated and ashamed and refuses to say anything to his brothers. Dr. Timorous knows the brothers socially. Though they are not his patients, he has seen one of them professionally in the past. He debates with himself. Shall he send carefully worded letters to the brothers urging the screening? Shall he just keep it all to himself? What is the ethical thing to do