This week, you will write a review of literature based on the technology you are investigating for your Course Project. A review of literature may be defined as an analysis of published information in a particular subject area. It has some similarities to an annotated bibliography, which you have completed in a previous class, but differs in important respects. An annotated bibliography focuses on annotations, or summaries, of sources. In contrast, a review of literature analyzes the sources, draws connections among them, and notes changes in thinking over time. A review of literature will focus on the following questions.

• What are the key points of agreement among the sources?
• What are the key points of disagreement among the sources?
• Do any of the sources appear to be outliers? In other words, are there any sources that bring up issues, or make assertions, that the other sources do not discuss?
• Which sources appear to be the most powerful or influential? Are there sources that all of the other sources deem highly authoritative?
• Are there any sources whose assertions seem dubious, illogical, or unsupported by the facts?
• How has thinking changed about your topic over time? Are there beliefs that have fallen out of favor?

Successful assignments will do the following.

• Analyze at least five sources from reputable publications that can be found in the DeVry Library.

Definition:

Enterprise Business Platforms, also known as EBP, are a collection of software programs and/or computer systems that are networked with one another and may be used together to produce enterprise holdings solutions.

EBP systems offer manufacturing techniques that are better and more efficient, as well as increased communication and much less waste.

Rental companies are able to manage their fleets and bookings from a single application when they use software designed specifically for the automobile rental industry. The information pertaining to customers, mapping technologies, and availability estimates may all be accessed quickly and easily through the use of dashboards.

Timeline:

The term "Enterprise Resource

Planning" (ERP) first appeared in use throughout the 1980s.

In the 1990s, enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems gained popularity and began to incorporate functions such as accounting, human resource management, and supply chain management.

In the 2000s, a new term called

Enterprise Business Platforms (EBP)

was developed to represent the integration of multiple software programs designed specifically for use in enterprises.

The 2010s saw a rise in the sophistication of EBP systems, which increasingly incorporated capabilities like as cloud computing, big data analytics, and artificial intelligence.

The COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020s boosted the adoption of EBP solutions as a result of the shift toward remote work that was implemented by many businesses, which necessitated the use of effective communication and collaboration technologies.

Questions of an Ethical Nature:

How can solutions based on evidence-based practice be utilized to advance diversity and combat discrimination during the employment process?

What kinds of potential ethical repercussions could result from employing EBP systems that make use of artificial intelligence and big data analytics?

How may EBP solutions be built so that user privacy and security are given priority during the development process?

Ethical Perspective:

Utilitarianism, which focuses on increasing overall pleasure or well-being for the greatest number of people, is one ethical theory that may be applied to the study of EBP solutions. Utilitarianism is an example of an ethical theory that can be applied to the analysis of EBP solutions. Deontology is an additional ethical theory that can be utilized. This theory places an emphasis on adhering to ethical standards and duties regardless of the results of one's actions.

Explanation:

The solution that was given is a response to a prompt that asks for a Swot matrix of an enterprise business platform technology, notably with regard to the ethical implications that it may have. The question is answered by dividing the SWOT analysis into four parts, which are as follows:

weaknesses, opportunities, threats, and strengths.

Under the heading of strengths, the response stresses the advantages of employing enterprise business platform technologies such as increased communication, more effective production processes, lower waste, and centralized management of fleet and reservations using a single application. It also discusses how this technology has the potential to have a positive effect on culture and society by eliminating discrimination in the hiring process, allowing access to a larger pool of candidates, and destroying cultural barriers that previously prevented people from connecting with one another.

The answer identifies external factors that may contribute to the success of the technology in the opportunities section. These factors include automation, social, political, and cultural trends that may influence reception, and an ICT ecosystem. An ICT ecosystem is made up of the policies, techniques, procedures, data, technologies, applications, and stakeholders that make up a country's, government's, or enterprise's technological environment.

The response notes that an excessive reliance on technological invention may lead to a society with less thinking, increased unemployment rates due to human capital depreciation, and the possibility that technological breakthroughs such as blockchain, big data, genetic engineering, biotechnology, and machine learning may pose a threat.

These points are discussed in the section of the question titled "Threats." The answer also discusses the

dangers that are related with issues in the supply chain, greater security hazards, and rapid technological progress.

Finally, in the section titled

"Weaknesses," the answer focuses on the aspects of the technology that could be barriers to the business's success. These aspects include customer service, decreased physical interactions, lower profit margins, increased competition, negative evaluations, and the cost to get started. In addition to this, it addresses the shortcomings of the technology, such as the potential for problems with the server database and the requirement for additional precautions to be taken against cyberattacks.

The response, in its whole, offers a thorough SWOT analysis of enterprise business platform technology, describing both the possible benefits and negatives of the technology in terms of the ethical implications it may

have.

What motivated the initial development of your technology? Which issue was it attempting to address and how?

The program that I use to recognize faces is my innovation. Initially, the technique was developed with the goal of enhancing safety and increasing the degree of precision achieved in identification verification. It was conceived with the intention of finding application in a diverse variety of industries, such as that of law enforcement, healthcare, transportation, and retail.

In the course of human history, what kind of an impact has your technology had on society? Are you able to recognize the ways in which your technology has affected different types of people and groups of people? Is there a reasonable relationship between the two?

There has been a varied reaction to the effects that facial recognition software has had on society. It has been utilized to improve access to services, hence enhancing security measures, as well as to increase overall public safety. On the other hand, it has also been attacked for a lack of accuracy in particular demographics, the possibility of power abuse, and the possibility of privacy violations.

Facial recognition software has been shown to have higher rates of inaccuracy with certain demographics, which has led to a disproportionately negative impact on people of color, women, and other marginalized groups. This has led to a disproportionately negative impact on people of color, women, and other marginalized groups.

Create a moral dilemma based on your investigation of the past uses of your technology (see the above example questions for guidance).

How can we make sure that facial recognition software is used fairly, without infringing on the rights of people of color, women, and other marginalized groups? What steps can be taken?

In recent years, there has been a rise in the use of facial recognition software due to the perception that it can enhance safety and security in a variety of settings, including public places, services, and other sectors. The technology was initially developed to improve the accuracy of identity verification. It was designed to be used in a wide range of fields, including law enforcement, healthcare, transportation, and retail, among other areas. Nonetheless, there has been a mixed reaction to the introduction of facial recognition software into society.

On the one hand, software that can recognize faces has been put to use to make public areas safer, to facilitate easier access to services, and to bolster safety precautions.

This has proven to be especially helpful for people who belong to traditionally marginalized groups. This is because people in these groups are frequently more likely to be the targets of criminal activity or discrimination. On the other hand, facial recognition software has been criticized for a number of reasons, including its lack of accuracy in some populations, its potential for abuse of power, and its potential for privacy violations. Facial recognition software has been shown to have higher rates of inaccuracy with certain demographics, which has led to a disproportionately negative impact on people of color, women, and other marginalized groups. This has led to a disproportionately negative impact on people of color, women, and other marginalized groups.

In light of this, it is essential to give some thought to the ethical repercussions that may result from using facial recognition software. The historical context of this technology raises one important ethical question: what steps can be taken to ensure that facial recognition software is used fairly, without violating the rights of people of color, women, and other marginalized groups? This is a question that arises from the historical context of this technology. Because facial recognition software has the potential to disproportionately damage particular communities and further marginalize them, it is vital to think about this matter and give it some consideration. It is essential to have checks and balances to guarantee that the use of facial recognition software is conducted in a manner that is both ethical and equitable.