Thought on the post. The post: The interviews appear to be parallel, especially after each interviewee gains a better understanding between domestic violence victims and homeless people. The community concerns, such as property value depreciation, beggars around the businesses (running off the patrons), and increased crime rates appear to be major, according to each interviewee. However, after the Turning Point interviewer seemed to be prepared to answer any question with which she was approached. She was able to explain domestic violence and the victims they aim to serve (women and children only). The interviewer was also able to explain how the victims need a place to reside for transition and so such victims and children (if they have children) will not have to return to the abuser. Ultimately, it appears the TP interviewer made great headway by getting interviewees on board with the project. The interviewer is also considering not calling the project a shelter so the community members will not be alarmed as Carlos suggested. The data collected appears to be valuable in making the project come forth and be successful for the victims who are in need