Translate the work completed on annotations and annotated bibliography into a 10-page,documented,properly formatted argumentative paper. One of the guidelines for the paper is that you cannot use quoted material. In your own words, explain what this means. How do you properly integrate sources if you cannot directly quote them?

Also, discuss the sources that you have settled on for use in your paper, and your plan for revision once you have received your peer editing feedback. What tips and tricks can you employ to ensure that your final product meets all of the qualifications of the assignment?

This is all my research on Adopting a pet rather than buying from a breeder or pet shops

Adopt Don't Shop

The research subject I chose for my final argument paper is "Should people adopt animals instead of buying them from breeders?" People often feel it is more of a hassle, steps-wise, than worth it. In my research, I've found many articles about why adopting a pet is better than buying one and the simple steps to adopt. This subject is suitable for a discussion paper because it is contentious and commonly debated, particularly with companion ownership. It allows for thoroughly considering different features and perspectives, making it ideal for argumentative papers.

My stance is to adopt rather than buy from a breeder. Adopting animals from shelters and rescue organizations is ethical, helps to minimize pet overpopulation, and saves the lives of needed animals. My reasoning for this position is as follows: Adoption is a humane and responsible decision that promotes animal welfare. Breeding and selling animals perpetuates the problem of overbreeding and promotes unhealthy and inhumane conditions for animals. For animals there are millions of them. Animals in animal shelters and rescue centers are waiting for loving homes, so buying from a breeder is unnecessary.

Adopt is a humanitarian and ethical act that supports animal welfare. Breeding and selling animals contributes to the problem of overbreeding and encourages unhealthy and harsh conditions for animals, and there are millions of animals. Animals in shelters and rescue facilities are looking for loving homes, so purchasing from a breeder is unnecessary.

Researching this will support my reasons for this position. There is a lot of data and evidence to research on the benefits of adoption and the issues of breeding and selling animals. However, if I can't find research to support your position, I will reevaluate the reasons and adjust my position.

To express the importance of this, it is essential to understand the topic and all viewpoints thoroughly. I formulated the following research question: "Why is adopting an animal more ethical and responsible than buying from a breeder?" This question will help me gather evidence to support my claims and show the overarching theme of animal welfare and responsibility that ties into pet ownership.

My "Adopt Don't Shop" topic is a solid and appropriate choice for an argument paper. My position supporting adoption and my three reasons for this stance create a clear and focused argument that research can help. Although research supports my position, I am willing to reevaluate and adjust my position if sufficient evidence is not found.

This research question allows me to consider the ethics and implications of pet ownership critically and represents a valuable contribution to the debate on pet adoption and breeding. The phrase

'Adopt Don't Shop' is an appropriate choice for argumentative papers. My position supporting adoption and my three reasons for this stance create a clear and focused argument that research can help. While research will support my position, I am open to re-evaluating and adjusting my stance if I cannot find sufficient evidence. This topic and research question allows for a critical investigation of the ethics and implications of pet ownership, making it a valuable contribution to the conversation surrounding pet adoption and breeding.

Works Cited

Chery, S. (2023, Jun 09). Fur flies as Pete's pet purchase peeves PETA.The Washington Posthttps://ezproxy.flcc.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/fur-flies-as-petes-pet-purchase-peeves-peta/docview/2823801556/se-2

Herzog, H. A. (2014). Some we love, some we hate, some we eat: Why it's so hard to think about animals. HarperCollins.

Irvine, L. (2006). If you tame me: Understanding our connection with animals. Temple University Press.

Reese, L. A., & Zawistowski, S. (2007). Pet overpopulation challenges companion animal veterinarians, shelter veterinarians, and society. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 34(6), 601-612.

Olson, P. N. (University of M., Moulton, C., Nett, T. N., & Salman, M. D. (1991). Pet overpopulation: A challenge for companion animal veterinarians in the 1990s.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association,198(7), 1151-1152.https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1991.198.07.1151

Rowan, A. N., & Kartal, T. (2018). Dog population & dog sheltering trends in the United States of America. Animals, 8(5), 68

Sill, K. (2013). Do The Right Thing, Adopt, Don't Shop!Deputy and Court Officer, 5(3), 39-40.https://ezproxy.flcc.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/do-right-thing-adopt-dont-shop/docview/1556427441/se-2

McDowell, K. (2018). Katie McDowell: Love, guaranteed: Adopt, don't shop for furever friends. InTCA Regional News. Tribune Content Agency LLC.

Walsh, O. (2019). Adopt, don't shop.UWIRE Text, 1-.

Adopt Don't Shop

The chosen research topic for the final argument paper is whether people should adopt animals instead of buying them from breeders. This topic is contentious and widely debated, especially in companion ownership. It invites thorough consideration of different perspectives, making it suitable for argumentative discourse. The research delves into numerous articles advocating for the adoption of pets over purchasing them and outlines the simple steps involved in the adoption process.

Adopting animals from shelters and rescue organizations rather than buying from breeders is posited as an ethical and responsible decision. This stance aims to address pet overpopulation, promote animal welfare, and save the lives of needy animals. Breeding and selling animals contribute to overbreeding and perpetuate unhealthy and inhumane conditions for animals while millions of animals await loving homes in shelters and rescue centers. Thus, adoption emerges as a humane and compassionate alternative to breeder purchasing.

Researching this topic entails examining data and evidence on the benefits of adoption and the ethical issues surrounding breeding and selling animals. The research question, "Why is adopting an animal more ethical and responsible than buying from a breeder?" guides the investigation by facilitating the gathering of evidence to support the argument. However, a commitment to reevaluate and adjust the position is maintained if sufficient evidence challenging the stance is encountered.

This research question represents a significant contribution to the debate on pet adoption and breeding, allowing for critical reflection on the ethics and implications of pet ownership.

The argument underscores the importance of animal welfare and responsibility in shaping societal attitudes towards companion animals by advocating for adoption over purchasing from breeders. Through thorough research and analysis, the argument aims to present a clear and focused perspective supported by evidence and informed reasoning.

Chery, S. (2023, June 09). "Fur flies as Pete's pet purchase peeves PETA." The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://ezproxy.flcc.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/fur-flies-as-petes-pet-purchase-peeves-peta/docview/2823801556/se-2

Chery (2023) reports on a controversial incident surrounding Pete's pet purchase that sparked outrage from the "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals," a.k.a (PETA). There are no details besides the title and source, but the article refers to the circumstances in which Pete acquired the pet and PETA's response. It's probably about the ethical implications of pet purchasing and the broader debate surrounding animal welfare. This article may cover various topics related to pet purchases, including ethical considerations when purchasing pets from specific sources versus adopting pets from shelters or rescue organizations. PETA's stance on pet ownership and efforts to promote animal rights and combat practices deemed harmful to animals could also be investigated.

Additionally, this article may provide context for broader issues within the pet industry and efforts to regulate breeding and sales practices. Additionally, this article offers perspectives from both sides of the controversy and may provide insight into Pete's motivations for purchasing a pet and PETA's reasons for opposition. It may be possible to examine society's attitudes toward pet ownership and the evolution of norms for responsible pet ownership. Additionally, the article may discuss the potential impact of this incident on the public debate on animal rights issues and the effectiveness of lobbying efforts by groups such as PETA. Overall, this article stimulates discussion about ethical considerations in pet ownership and highlights the continuing tension between individual rights and concerns for animal welfare in today's society. PETA aims to educate the public through investigative newsgathering and reporting, research, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity involvement, and protest campaigns.

Herzog, H. A. (2014). "Some we love, some we hate, some we eat":Why it's so hard to think about animals. HarperCollins.

Herzog (2014) presents an interesting perspective on the complex, frequently contradictory way in which humans view and interact with animals in "Some We Love, Some We Eat, Some We Eat,"suggesting that we take into account the emotional, cultural, and ethical factors that influence our attitudes towards animals from beloved pets to those reared for food. The contents of this article may be unknown. However, it addresses psychological mechanisms that underlie human attitudes and behavior toward animals, social norms, and cultural conventions shaping relationships between people and animals. The article shows the relationship between people and animals, including emotional attachments to pets, moral issues of animal welfare and rights, and cultural and historical factors that impact attitudes towards animals as food. Herzog uses psychological research, philosophical investigations, and real-world examples to show the complexity of human relationships while challenging readers to examine their beliefs and animal behavior critically. Some We Love, Some We Eat, Some We Eat is to provide a comprehensive and thought-provoking analysis of the complexity of human-animal relationships.

Irvine, Leslie. (2006). "If You Tame Me: Understanding Our Connection with Animals". Temple University Press.

In If You Tame Me (2006), Leslie Irvine digs into the perplexing and profound bond between people and creatures, investigating the different measurements of our association with non-human beings. The title implies the famous line from De Saint-Exupry's The Little Prince, indicating an investigation of human-animal connections' passionate, mental, and spiritual angles. Whereas particular points of interest in the book's content are unavailable, it looks at how people determine meaning, companionship, and fulfillment from their interactions with animals, whether as pets, companions, or study subjects.

The book covers various topics related to human-animal associations, including the historical and social settings of our relationships with animals, the mental mechanisms underlying our bonds, and the moral contemplations surrounding animal welfare and rights. Irvine draws on intriguing viewpoints, weaving together experiences from psychology, sociology, anthropology, and animal studies to offer a nuanced understanding of the complexities of our intelligence with non-human beings.

"If You Tame Me" provides a rich and insightful investigation of the multifaceted nature of human-animal relationships. By examining the emotional, social, and moral dimensions of our connections with animals, Irvine's book offers valuable viewpoints on how these relationships shape our characters, values, and sense of having a place within the world.

Reese, L. A., & Zawistowski, S. (2007). "Pet overpopulation challenges companion animal veterinarians, shelter veterinarians, and society." Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 34(6), 601-612.

In the journal "Pet Overpopulation: A Challenge for Companion Animal Veterinarians, Shelter Veterinarians" and Society, Reese and Zawistowski address the issue of pet overpopulation and its implications for various stakeholders, including companion animal veterinarians, shelter veterinarians, and society as an entirety. The authors investigate the challenges and responsibilities veterinarians confront in managing the consequences of pet overpopulation and emphasize the significance of collaboration and proactive measures to address the issue successfully. The article covers a range of points related to pet overpopulation, including the causes and consequences of the problem, the impact on animal welfare and public wellbeing, and the role of veterinarians in promoting responsible pet ownership and population control measures. Reese and Zawistowski may provide experiences with the strategies and initiatives veterinarians and animal welfare organizations attempted to manage pet overpopulation, such as spaying and neutering campaigns, adoption programs, and public education endeavors. Addressing the multifaceted nature of pet overpopulation, the authors raise awareness among veterinarians and society about the significance of responsible pet ownership and the need for proactive measures to control the population of companion animals. The article gives valuable experiences and suggestions that can inform the practices and policies of veterinarians and contribute to the broader conversation on pet overpopulation and animal welfare.

Olson, P. N., Moulton, C., Nett, T. N., & Salman, M. D. (1991). "Pet overpopulation: A challenge for companion animal veterinarians in the 1990s".Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 198(7), 1151-1152.https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1991.198.07.1151

Based on the title and data, the article centers on pet overpopulation and its implications for companion animal veterinarians in the 1990s. The creators examine the challenges and obligations confronted by veterinarians in tending to pet overpopulation and the significance of finding arrangements for this issue.

The article may cover subjects such as the causes and results of pet overpopulation, its effect on creature welfare and open well-being, and the role of veterinarians in advancing dependable pet possession and populace control measures. The creators provide bits of knowledge, suggestions, and potential methodologies for veterinarians to address the challenges posed by pet overpopulation at that time.

RON HOENIGMEDIA RELEASENSW RESIDENTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO "ADOPT DON'T SHOP FOR A PURR-FECT PRESENT THIS CHRISTMAS"THURSDAY, 21 DECEMBER 2023. (2023). InARRN StateGov Newswire.

This article shows how NSW residents are urged to adopt from a local shelter instead of shopping for pets. It states there has been a rise in surrendered or abandoned animals, leading to many pets needing forever homes across the state. Hoenig states that as of June 2023, 21,580 dogs and 14,370 cats were in the pound system. Of these, 5,680 dogs and 5,030 cats were released to rehoming organizations. This shows how adopting a pet gives animals a second chance and reduces demand on state facilities, including 100 rehoming organizations and 98 council pounds in NSW. It also advises how pet owners should remember to microchip, desex, and register their pets on the NSW Pet Registry. For many lost or runaway pets, he also encourages pet owners to update their pet's info on the NSW Pet Registry, which is crucial for a better chance at a happy reunion. This article supports my beliefs on adopting a pet rather than purchasing from a pet store or breeder. This is how you can give them the life they deserve.

Rowan, A. N., & Kartal, T. (2018). "Dog population & dog sheltering trends in the United States of America. Animals", 8(5), 68.

In their study, Rowan and Kartal (2018) look at the patterns in dog population and dog sheltering within the United States of America. The title concisely summarizes the article's focus, showing an investigation into the elements of dog demographics and sheltering practices inside the country. While particular details of the study's discoveries are not available, it includes a comprehensive investigation of information related to dog population patterns, shelter admissions rates, appropriation rates, and willful extermination rates.

The study covers different perspectives on dog population administration and sheltering practices, including factors affecting pet ownership, community initiatives pointed at diminishing shelter admissions, and the adequacy of adoption programs and spay/neuter campaigns. Rowan and Kartal utilize measurable analyses and comparative assessments to recognize patterns and trends in dog population dynamics over different regions and demographic groups inside the United States. This study offers essential knowledge about the current dog population and sheltering patterns within the United States. By analyzing the dynamics of dog demographics and sheltering practices, Rowan and Kartal's inquiry contributes to our understanding of the challenges and opportunities in successfully managing puppy populations and advancing responsible pet ownership practices.

Sill, K. (2013). "Do The Right Thing, Adopt, Don't Shop! Deputy and Court Officer," 5(3), 39-40. Retrieved from https://ezproxy.flcc.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/do-right-thing-adopt-dont-shop/docview/1556427441/se-2

In the article Do The Right Thing, Adopt Don't Shop! Deputy and Court Officer (2013), author Sill, K. stresses that animals should be adopted from shelters instead of buying from breeders or pet stores. The title states that adopting animals that need homes is ethical rather than supporting commercial farming. It shows the moral and social reasons for choosing to adopt instead of buying a dog, other opinions on adoption from an animal shelter, and its benefits and consequences. It also shows the importance of responsible pet ownership.

Sill's article serves as a cry for help, encouraging readers to consider animal welfare and make informed choices when purchasing a pet. By promoting animal shelter appropriation, the article helps raise awareness about homeless animals.

In summary:

I've come across many resources, but these are just a few. I chose these resources because they show my stance on pet adoption. They will help readers understand how important it is to save a life and adopt a pet from a shelter. These articles support my beliefs about pet adoption and the consequences of not adopting and buying from a breeder or pet store, which has been an ongoing problem for many years.