TRUE or FALSE: The law draws a sharp distinction between innocent misrepresentations and fraudulent misrepresentations. If you $($the seller$)$ intended to misrepresent the nature or quality of your goods to a potential purchaser, you've committed a fraudulent misrepresentation, and the purchaser may avoid the contract $($that is$,$ he'll be able to ignore $/$ get out of the contract, and you won't be able to successtuly sue him$),$ However, consistent with notions of fainess and ethics, if you committed the misrepresentation innocently $($for example, you relayed incorrect information about the goods that you honestly and reasonably believed was true$),$ the purchaser cannot avoid the contract.