Type up a response to the case below. State the principle of law and your decision, and explain your reasoning. Then, respond to two other posts in this thread.

Lionel rented an empty downtown building, signing a lease indicating that he would open a movie theater. When Lionel began his business operations, his movie theater concept specialized in art films and classic films. After several months, he realized that the business was doomed to fail because not enough customers came to see art films and classic films. He tried to salvage his business by changing his business strategy. Lionel began showing adult films in his movie theater. The change helped the business make money, but attracted a different customer base, which the landlord did not like.The landlord began an eviction action, claiming that Lionel had violated the terms of his lease. Is it likely that the landlord will be successful in evicting Lionel? Is the landlord asking the court to grant an order for constructive eviction? Could the landlord have prevented the disagreement? How?