Question: Under the effects test as interpreted in Animal Science, could an effect be reasonably foresee-able even if the defendant does not foresee the effect? In
Under the effects test as interpreted in Animal Science, could an effect be "reasonably foresee-able" even if the defendant does not foresee the effect? In a trial, how would you prove that an effect was "reasonably foreseeable"?
Step by Step Solution
★★★★★
3.40 Rating (163 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Yes under the effects test in Animal Science an effect could b... View full answer
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
