Upon consideration of the program evaluation communication plan created in Week 7, a few significant evaluation results emerge that are vital to communicate. These range from observable effects such as participant response rates, attainment of learning objectives, and changes in specified behaviors or skills. It includes both numerical information (such as attendance and test results) and qualitative evidence (e.g., participant perspectives, testimonials) to provide a rounded picture of the program's impact (Patton 2015).

Communication: There ought to be regular communication, something like quarterly updates if you are tracking progress, annual reports if you arelooking at outcomes, and longer-range impact. Also, on-the-go news may be needed when something critical or challenging occurs. This frequency balances transparency and practicality, so individuals stay in the know without becoming oversaturated (McDavid, Huse, & Hawthorn, 2018).

The audience is internal stakeholders (program staff, up to organization leadership, and funders) and external stakeholders, such as community partners, policymakers, and participants. Adapting communication formats (e.g., report summaries for leaders, infographics for community members, and detailed reports for funding agencies) makes data accessible to multiple audiences (Fitzpatrick et al., 2011).

The monitoring of the accuracy, promptness, and frequency of communication will be the responsibility of the program evaluation manager. This person will work with data analysts and communicators to make sure findings are correctly interpreted and clearly communicated. A review protocol comprising peer-reviewed checks and stakeholder feedback loops should be introduced to enhance transparency and accountability (Preskill & Torres, 1999).

Finally, a clearly defined communication plan builds trust, drives decision-making, and enhances the program's value to its stakeholders.

Assignment

Review the above article and explain why you agree with the author's viewpoint.