USE ONLY INFORMATION BELOW TO WRITE A PARAGRAPH HAVE 170 WORDS TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION, Conduct an in-depth analysis for Business-class CSR mobilizations: Premises and propositions Business-class CSR mobilizations: Premises and propositions In our understanding, then, the defining features of business-class mobilizations are the classwide rationality (interests, goals, and strategy) informing mobilizationas shaped in the context of class-level, macro-political challenges, the attempts by business activists to mobilize the class for collective political action to address the challenge; and the activists' use of PBAs as organizational instruments to prompt and manage mobilization. At the same time, we would not consider high levels of unity as reflected, for example, in dyadic similarity of policy preferences among individual corporations as a necessary or defining feature of business-class mobilizations. Such postulation would be unproductively restrictive, because business-class interests are typically mobilized upon by sub-class groups such as dominant segments of the capitalist class that transcend their own individual interests to act politically for broader class wide goals. In other cases, moreover, we see fragmentation in addition to incompleteness: various factions of the business class develop divergent articulations of class wide rationality, which inform multiple separate sub-class mobilizations. That is to say, in real world business-class mobilizations, a sub-class group or several of themwhich mobilize upon one or more class-level strategiesrepresent the class in its struggle to address the focal macro-political challenge Business-class mobilizations' quantitative width of unity is limited also for another reason: they are not armies. Their mobilization capacity is inherently limited as compared to formally hierarchic organizations. While the aforementioned activists of business-class action would often try to mobilize all the other members of the class on their strategic articulations, trans-corporate recruitment to mobilization is not likely to reach 100% or anything close to that. The voluntary nature of individual company participation in class mobilization, problems of collective action and free riding, discrepancies between company-level interests and the more general ones pursued through mobilization and, as mentioned above, intra-business disputes over how to define and pursue class interestsall militate against unity as measured through interfirm pattems of political action. Hence, while the quantitative width of class consensus and unity of action continues to be an important indicator of the significance of business-class mobilizations and predictor of their societal impact, this criterion should not restrict our understanding of how class wide interests are actually mobilized upon and promoted