. Use the argument below to answer the following problem. Word form Symbolic form Premise 1: If it is sunny then Ben will go biking Let: Premise 2: It is not sunny s = It is sunny Conclusion: Therefore, Ben did not go biking b = Ben will go biking a. Using a truth table, can the argument can be considered as valid? (5 points) Proof: How many truth value combinations do you need to prove the validity of the statement? Show your solution. (2 points) *Insert truth table* (3 points) Answer: (in statement form) b. If premise 2 will be changed to "Ben will not go biking" would it be valid to conclude that it is not sunny? (5 points) Word form Symbolic form Premise 1: If it is sunny then Ben will go biking Let: Premise 2: Ben will not go biking s = It is sunny Conclusion: Therefore, it is not sunny. b = Ben will go biking Proof: How many truth value combinations do you need to prove the validity of the statement? Show your solution. (2 points) *Insert truth table* (3 points)