Use the issues you glean regarding the case analysis to critically review the file and give your comment. Then submit a 300-400-word critique of the file.

• When you get the critique of your analysis (feedback):
  • In a separate file, respond to the critique by answering the questions, justifying your choices.
  • Constructive criticism(s)

From my point of view, Author needed to add an introduction at first to let the readers to know about the background of the company. Moreover, author needed a conclusion at the end and should have utilized the references a bit more. There was not much of missing information in this project. The mission of the company is not provided here. There is some information which were not needed in this review as per the instructions. Important part of this project was to talk about the two competitors, and author added but the information is very less. Should have written about the competitors separately with more information about them. Use of references are remarkable. Authors should have dig more into his competitors,

It needs to be neat with the information. All the topics should be written separately. As the author wrote about the competitors together, that is why could not see that he/she has added the information. Proper headings are needed to make it clear. Need to focus on the main purpose of the project. Overall, this project is quite good to read and followed all the instructions. All the details were given precisely which made it easier to read and got to learn about the three companies, author has worked on.

General comments:

The comparison of Nestle with McDonalds could have been done with the help of a table to make it captive. Some of the paragraph might have been composed in a better way because of it being a superior method of introducing an examination. The passage is wonderful with a precise data. It has overall connections which gets them a chief nature of network and connection. My critique is looking into the study report 3 created on Nestle and McDonalds examined the issues with respect to the contextual investigation components, contextual analysis techniques, just as proposed options where proper. The documentation was developed well but yet simply needs to deal for certain parts to a great extent. And the paper needs to be construct additional explanation according to the instructions of the professor guideline