Question: use the Ivey case analysis method to analyze, case study oppressive work environment cases. Oppressive Work Environment Mariam works for a large Brazilian bank. Mariam
use the Ivey case analysis method to analyze, case study oppressive work environment cases.
Oppressive Work Environment
Mariam works for a large Brazilian bank. Mariam and fellow staff members are advised that because of changing economic conditions, and the need to ensure that the bank meets shareholder expectations, the bank will undertake organisational restructuring. Staff are advised that a number of branches will close and that job losses of about 6,500 will be covered by voluntary redundancy. Some staff react to the bank's announcement by going on sick leave.
The change process particularly embitters Mariam's manager, who has worked for the bank for 27 years. Once an affable, likeable manager, he now shouts and swears at staff, lacks patience, is intolerant, abuses people, and becomes autocratic and terse in his managerial style. When speaking to some of his staff, particularly those who have chosen to accept the bank's voluntary redundancy package, he is sarcastic. He yells at them to complete set tasks, chastises them for minor errors, criticizes them in front of other staff members and customers, and generally "makes life difficult".
Mariam considers that she has a strong work ethic, but finds it increasingly difficult to work with her manager. The manager's behaviour leaves Mariam suffering from a "combination of anxiety and depression" that eventually manifests in chest pains. Mariam says, "I thought I was having heart attacks every day and I had to actually go and get some medical help". Mariam admits that she paints herself as a victim, is bitter, anxious and depressed, and is at a loss to understand why.
Complete the following from the IVEY Case Analysis Form:
Background
Immediate Issues and Symptoms
Root Cause/Basic Underlying Issues
4. Analysis of Case Data
5. Describe Alternative to Resolve Root Cause/basic Issues
6. Decision Criteria
7. Alternative Assessment
8. Recommendations
9. Implementation Plan
THE ANSWER YOU HAVE GIVEN IS WRONG. IT SHOULD BE IN IVEY CASE ANALYSIS FORMAT. I AM GIVING YOU A SAMPLE TEMPLATE . PLEASE DO AS PER THE FORMAT
Case Analysis Form Ivey
| Background Information or synopsis (use point form) Select the most relevant facts from the case which have a direct bearing on the issue at hand: |
People Issues
Structural Issues
Assumptions
| Immediate Issues/Symptoms | ||
| Explain (list from most to least severe) | Who is involved? What is their role and responsibility in creating or resolving this issue? | Impact on costs, quality, customer service, or innovation? |
|
| ||
| Root Cause/Basic Underlying Issues | ||
| Explain (list from most to least severe) | Who is involved? What is their role and responsibility in creating or resolving this issue? | Impact on costs, quality, customer service, or innovation? |
|
| ||
Analysis of Case Data
| Causes & Effects | |
| CONSTRAINTS |
|
|
| |
| Quantitative Data |
|
| Qualitative Data | |
| Course Concepts Relevant to Case | L |
Describe alternatives to resolve root cause/basic issues.
| Issue | Considerations/Support |
|
|
|
|
| I |
|
| T |
|
Creation of Cross-Sectional Teams
|
|
|
Do Nothing |
|
| Decision Criteria | |
| What are the criteria that are important to making this decision? | Justification for choosing this criterion |
|
Productivity
|
|
|
Staff Turnover
| T |
|
Corporate Image
| L |
|
Employee Morale
|
|
|
Quality
|
|
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
