Using: Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2020). Ethics code for behavior analysts- https://bacb.com/wp-content/ethics-code-for-behavior-analysts/

Within this sceranio below-

Mave is a BCBA working in a small, rural community where services for children with developmental disabilities are limited. A parent contacts her about their 9-year-old child, Jenny, who recently diagnosed with a rare chromosomal disorder. The child displays severe self-injurious behavior (SIB) and limited communication skills. While Mave has extensive experience with children with autism and behavioral challenges, she has never worked with a client with this particular diagnosis.

The parent expresses urgency, as the child's behaviors are escalating, and the family feels isolated due to a lack of local support. They explain that they've been turned away by nearby therapists who feel unqualified to help and are hopeful that Mave can intervene. However, Mave is unsure if she can effectively meet the child's needs without significant research, training, or collaboration with other professionals. The nearest specialized resource is a five-hour drive away, and the family cannot afford the travel or costs for out-of-area services.

This creates a complex ethical situation where Mave must balance her professional competence, the child's best interests, and the practical limitations of her geographical location.

Answer this question: Match each action with its corresponding associated risk.

Group of answer choices

Consult with a specialist or colleague experienced in the client's specific needs.

[ Choose ] Research may uncover conflicting evidence, creating uncertainty about the best intervention to use. The specialist may provide guidance that conflicts with the BCBA's scope of practice, requiring additional time and resources for resolution. The BCBA's confidence may decline when seeking external input, leading to self-doubt about their professional competence. Referrals may result in delays in service delivery or difficulty finding a professional with the necessary expertise. Collaboration with the client's legal representative may lead to disagreements about priorities, delaying intervention implementation Seeking consultation might lead to sharing client details inappropriately, risking confidentiality breaches. Insufficient evidence to support specific interventions, could negatively impact necessary decisions for the client's care.

Collaborate with the client's legal representative.

[ Choose ] Research may uncover conflicting evidence, creating uncertainty about the best intervention to use. The specialist may provide guidance that conflicts with the BCBA's scope of practice, requiring additional time and resources for resolution. The BCBA's confidence may decline when seeking external input, leading to self-doubt about their professional competence. Referrals may result in delays in service delivery or difficulty finding a professional with the necessary expertise. Collaboration with the client's legal representative may lead to disagreements about priorities, delaying intervention implementation Seeking consultation might lead to sharing client details inappropriately, risking confidentiality breaches. Insufficient evidence to support specific interventions, could negatively impact necessary decisions for the client's care.

Research evidence-based interventions specific to the client's needs.

[ Choose ] Research may uncover conflicting evidence, creating uncertainty about the best intervention to use. The specialist may provide guidance that conflicts with the BCBA's scope of practice, requiring additional time and resources for resolution. The BCBA's confidence may decline when seeking external input, leading to self-doubt about their professional competence. Referrals may result in delays in service delivery or difficulty finding a professional with the necessary expertise. Collaboration with the client's legal representative may lead to disagreements about priorities, delaying intervention implementation Seeking consultation might lead to sharing client details inappropriately, risking confidentiality breaches. Insufficient evidence to support specific interventions, could negatively impact necessary decisions for the client's care.

Refer the client to another qualified professional.