Using the article, Explain the conclusions below and arguments below that Ones et al. (2007) made in response to the Morgeson et al. (2007) criticisms of personality testing. According to the authors, what are the primary arguments in support of using personsality in selection?

1. Personality variables, as measured by self-reports, have substantial validities, which has been established in several quantitative reviews of hundreds of peer-reviewed research studies.

2. Vote counting and qualitative opinions are scientifically inferior alter- natives to quantitative reviews and psychometric meta-analysis.

3.Selfreportsofpersonality,inlargeapplicantsamplesandactualselec- tion setting (where faking is often purported to distort responses), have yielded substantial validities even for externally obtained (e.g., super- visory ratings, detected counterproductive behaviors) and/or objective criteria (e.g., production records).

4. Faking does not ruin the criterion-related or construct validity of per- sonality scores in applied settings.

5.Othernoncognitivepredictorsmayderivetheirvalidityfromcapturing relevant personality trait variance.

6. Customized tests are not necessarily superior to traditional standard- ized personality tests.

7. When feasible, utilizing both self and observer ratings of personality likely produces validities that are comparable to the most valid selec- tion measures.

8.Proposedpalliatives(e.g.,conditionalreasoning,forcedchoiceipsative measures), when critically reviewed, do not currently offer viable al- ternatives to traditional self-report personality inventories.

explain 1-8