Using the information below as a case study Can the differences between he two firms/corporations (Mag silver corp, and canadian national railway) be explained by the three paradigms i.e., can the tensions between private interests and public/social interests be explained by the Neoclassical, Mixed, and Radical paradigms?

Case

Board Composition:

MAG silver corp: The board of directors is composed of eight members, four of whom are independent.

Canadian national railway: The board of directors is composed of 15 members, with a majority of independent directors.

Shareholding and compensation:

MAG silver corp: The CEO and CFO are the only insiders who own shares. All other directors are non-executive and do not own shares. Compensation is based on salary and bonuses.

Canadian national railway: The CEO, CFO and several other executives own shares. Directors are compensated with a mix of cash and shares.

Explanation:

Composition of the Board:

MAG Silver Corporation has a total of eight members on its board of directors, with four of those members being independent.

The board of directors of Canadian National Railway consists of 15 individuals, with the vast majority of the positions held by independent directors.

Participation in the company and financial gain:

The only insiders other than the CEO and CFO who possess MAG silver corp shares are the CEO and CFO. Every other director serves in a non-executive capacity and does not have any shares in the company. Salary and bonuses are the two components that make up total compensation.

The chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and a number of senior officials at Canadian National Railway are shareholders. Directors get compensation that consists of a combination of cash and shares in the company.