Question: Using the table above, set out the main ethical considerations that are suggested by each of the NINE theories in the table Table: Considerations in

Using the table above, set out the main ethical considerations that are suggested by each of the NINE theories in the table
Table: Considerations in making ethical decisions, summary of ethical theories insights Consideration One's own interest Social consequences Duties to others Typical question you might ask yourself Theory Is this really in my, or my organization's, best long-term Egoism interests? Would it be acceptable and expected for me to think only of the consequences to myself in this situation? If I consider all of the possible consequences of my actions, Utilitarianism for everyone that is affected, will we be better or worse off overall? How likely are these consequences and how significant are they? Who do I have obligations to in this situation? What would Ethics of happen if everybody acted in the same way as me? Am I duty treating people only to get what I want for myself (or my organization) or am I thinking also of what they might want too? Whose rights do I need to consider here? Am I respecting Ethics of fundamental human rights and people's need for dignity? rights Am I treating everyone fairly here? Have processes been set Theories of up to allow everyone an equal chance? Are there major justice Entitlements of others Fairness Virtue ethics Character and integrity Relationships and responsibility Feminist ethics Procedures of norm generation disparities between the winners' and 'losers' that could be avoided? Am I acting with integrity here? What would a decent, honest person do in the same situation? How do (or would) the other affected parties feel in this situation? Can I avoid doing harm to others? Which solution is most likely to preserve healthy and harmonious relationships among those involved? What norms can we work out together to provide a mutually acceptable solution to this problem? How can we achieve a peaceful settlement of this conflict that avoids railroading' by the most powerful player? Am I just simply going along with the usual practice here, or slavishly following the organization's code, without questioning whether it really feels right to me? How can I get closer to those likely to be affected by my decision? What do my emotions or gut feelings tell me once I'm out of the office? Discourse ethics Empathy and moral impulse Postmodern ethics Table: Considerations in making ethical decisions, summary of ethical theories insights Consideration One's own interest Social consequences Duties to others Typical question you might ask yourself Theory Is this really in my, or my organization's, best long-term Egoism interests? Would it be acceptable and expected for me to think only of the consequences to myself in this situation? If I consider all of the possible consequences of my actions, Utilitarianism for everyone that is affected, will we be better or worse off overall? How likely are these consequences and how significant are they? Who do I have obligations to in this situation? What would Ethics of happen if everybody acted in the same way as me? Am I duty treating people only to get what I want for myself (or my organization) or am I thinking also of what they might want too? Whose rights do I need to consider here? Am I respecting Ethics of fundamental human rights and people's need for dignity? rights Am I treating everyone fairly here? Have processes been set Theories of up to allow everyone an equal chance? Are there major justice Entitlements of others Fairness Virtue ethics Character and integrity Relationships and responsibility Feminist ethics Procedures of norm generation disparities between the winners' and 'losers' that could be avoided? Am I acting with integrity here? What would a decent, honest person do in the same situation? How do (or would) the other affected parties feel in this situation? Can I avoid doing harm to others? Which solution is most likely to preserve healthy and harmonious relationships among those involved? What norms can we work out together to provide a mutually acceptable solution to this problem? How can we achieve a peaceful settlement of this conflict that avoids railroading' by the most powerful player? Am I just simply going along with the usual practice here, or slavishly following the organization's code, without questioning whether it really feels right to me? How can I get closer to those likely to be affected by my decision? What do my emotions or gut feelings tell me once I'm out of the office? Discourse ethics Empathy and moral impulse Postmodern ethics