Using the topic study materials, research a reputable (nonprofit Habitat) organization that serves people and the community as a servant leader.

Create a 3-6-slide PowerPoint presentation, then record your 5-7-minute presentation using a YouTube video or Loom that illustrates how the nonprofit organization you chose puts servant leadership into action.

The content slides should provide detailed speakers notes that include supporting examples and citations.

The detailed speaker's notes will serve as a verbatim transcript of the audio portion of your video that will cover the following: Specific information about the servant leadership principles employed by the organization and Examples of how implementing servant leadership principles has helped the organization achieve success while having a positive impact on people and the community.

Explanation of which servant leadership principles you recognize as most valuable and would consider integrating within your own organization. Use a minimum of two resources to strengthen and support your claims. Each section of your presentation should include in-text citations.

On the title slide of your PowerPoint presentation, provide the link to the YouTube or Loom video recording you created APA format is not required, but solid academic writing with supporting citations and specific examples is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Servant Leadership Principles Employed 22 points

Criteria Description

Servant Leadership Principles Employed

5. Excellent22 points

Specific servant leadership principles employed by the organization are extremely thorough and include extensive explanation, supporting details, and citations.

4. Good19.14 points

Specific servant leadership principles employed by the organization are complete and include relevant explanation, supporting details, and supporting citations.

3. Satisfactory17.38 points

Specific servant leadership principles employed by the organization are explained but lacks supporting details or supporting citations.

2. Less Than Satisfactory16.28 points

Specific servant leadership principles employed by the organization are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Specific servant leadership principles employed by the organization are not explained, or the organization is not a reputable nonprofit that serves people and the community as a servant leader.

Examples of Success and Positive Impact 22 points

Criteria Description

Examples of Success and Positive Impact

5. Excellent22 points

Examples of how implementing servant leadership principles have helped the organization achieve success while having a positive impact on people and the community are included with details that provided additional insight and supporting citations.

4. Good19.14 points

Examples of how implementing servant leadership principles have helped the organization achieve success while having a positive impact on people and the community are included with clarifying details and supporting citations.

3. Satisfactory17.38 points

Examples of how implementing servant leadership principles have helped the organization achieve success while having a positive impact on people and the community is included but lacks clarifying details or supporting citations.

2. Less Than Satisfactory16.28 points

Examples of how implementing servant leadership principles have helped the organization achieve success while having a positive impact on people and the community are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Examples of how implementing servant leadership principles have helped the organization achieve success while having a positive impact on people and the community are not explained.

Valued Servant Leadership Principles to be Integrated 22 points

Criteria Description

Valued Servant Leadership Principles to be Integrated

5. Excellent22 points

Servant leadership principles are thoroughly explained with personal insight as to the reason that they are valuable and worth integrating within one's own organization and supporting citations.

4. Good19.14 points

Servant leadership principles are thoroughly explained and include the reason that they are valuable and worth integrating within one's own organization and supporting citations.

3. Satisfactory17.38 points

Servant leadership principles are explained and include the reason that they are valuable and worth integrating within one's own organization, but lacks supporting details or supporting citations.

2. Less Than Satisfactory16.28 points

Servant leadership principles are explained, but the reason they are valuable and worth integrating within one's own organization is unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Servant leadership principles are explained, but the reason they are valuable and worth integrating within one's own organization is not explained.

Speaker Notes 22 points

Criteria Description

Speaker Notes

5. Excellent22 points

Speaker notes match the video audio and enhance comprehenshion of the content and include insightful examples and supportive citations.

4. Good19.14 points

Speaker notes match the video audio and enhance comprehenshion of the content and include supportive examples and citations.

3. Satisfactory17.38 points

Speaker notes match the video audio, are related to the content, and include supportive examples and citations.

2. Less Than Satisfactory16.28 points

Speaker notes do not match the video audio, are not related to the content, or do not include examples and citations.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Speaker notes or video recording are not provided.

Layout 11 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent11 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good9.57 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and font size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory8.69 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less Than Satisfactory8.14 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult because of lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text displayed in a small font size, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Mechanics of Writing 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (e.g., spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. Excellent5.5 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good4.79 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory4.35 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory4.07 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (e.g., citations, footnotes, references, bibliography are appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent5.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good4.79 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory4.35 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory4.07 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total110 points