Volkswagen's Hedging Strategy In January 2004, Volkswagen, Europe's largest carmaker, reported a 95 percent drop in...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Volkswagen's Hedging Strategy In January 2004, Volkswagen, Europe's largest carmaker, reported a 95 percent drop in 2003 fourth-quarter profits, which slumped from €1.05 billion to a mere €50 million. For all of 2003, Volkswagen's operating profit fell by 50 percent from the record levels attained in 2002. Although the profit slump had multiple causes, two factors were the focus of much attention- the sharp rise in the value of the euro against the dollar during 2003 and Volkswagen's decision to hedge only 30 percent of its foreign currency exposure, as opposed to the 70 percent it had traditionally hedged. In total, currency losses due to the dollar's rise are estimated to have reduced Volkswagen's operating profits by some €1.2 billion ($1.5 billion). The rise in the value of the euro during 2003 took many companies by surprise. Since its introduction January 1, 1999, when it became the currency unit of 12 members of the European Union, the euro had recorded a volatile trading history against the U.S. dollar. In early 1999, the exchange rate stood at €1 = $1.17, but by October 2000 it had slumped to €1 = $0.83. Although it recovered, reaching parity of €1 = $1.00 in late 2002, few analysts predicted a rapid rise in the value of the euro against the dollar during 2003. As so often happens in the foreign exchange markets, the experts were wrong; by late 2003, the exchange rate stood at €1 = $1.25. For Volkswagen, which made cars in Germany and exported them to the United States, the fall in the value of the dollar against the euro during 2003 was devastating. To understand what happened, consider a Volkswagen Jetta built in Germany for export to the United States. Volkswagen could have insured against this adverse movement in exchange rates by entering the foreign exchange market in late 2002 and buying a forward contract for dollars at an exchange rate of around $1 = €1 (a forward contract gives the holder the right to exchange one currency for another at some point in the future at a predetermined exchange rate). Called hedging, the financial strategy of buying forward guarantees that at some future point, such as 180 days, Volkswagen would have been able to exchange the dollars it got from selling Jettas in the United States into euros at $1 = €1, irrespective of what the actual exchange rate was at that time. In 2003, such a strategy would have been good for Volkswagen. However, hedging is not without its costs. For one thing, if the euro had declined in value against the dollar, instead of appreciating as it did, Volkswagen would have made even more profit per car in euros by not hedging (a dollar at the end of 2003 would have bought more euros than a dollar at the end of 2002). For another thing, hedging is expensive because foreign exchange dealers will charge a high commission for selling currency forward. Volkswagen decided to hedge just 30 percent of its anticipated U.S. sales in 2003 through forward contracts, rather than the 70 percent it had historically hedged. The decision cost the company more than €1 billion. For 2004, the company reverted back to hedging 70 percent of its foreign currency exposure. Sources: Mark Landler, "As Exchange Rates Swing, Car Makers Try to Duck," The New York Times, January 17, 2004, pp. B1, B4; N. Boudette, "Volkswagen Posts 95% Drop in Net," The Wall Street Journal, February 19, 2004, p. A3; "Volkswagen's Financial Mechanic," Corporate Finance, June 2003, p. 1. Volkswagen's Hedging Strategy In January 2004, Volkswagen, Europe's largest carmaker, reported a 95 percent drop in 2003 fourth-quarter profits, which slumped from €1.05 billion to a mere €50 million. For all of 2003, Volkswagen's operating profit fell by 50 percent from the record levels attained in 2002. Although the profit slump had multiple causes, two factors were the focus of much attention- the sharp rise in the value of the euro against the dollar during 2003 and Volkswagen's decision to hedge only 30 percent of its foreign currency exposure, as opposed to the 70 percent it had traditionally hedged. In total, currency losses due to the dollar's rise are estimated to have reduced Volkswagen's operating profits by some €1.2 billion ($1.5 billion). The rise in the value of the euro during 2003 took many companies by surprise. Since its introduction January 1, 1999, when it became the currency unit of 12 members of the European Union, the euro had recorded a volatile trading history against the U.S. dollar. In early 1999, the exchange rate stood at €1 = $1.17, but by October 2000 it had slumped to €1 = $0.83. Although it recovered, reaching parity of €1 = $1.00 in late 2002, few analysts predicted a rapid rise in the value of the euro against the dollar during 2003. As so often happens in the foreign exchange markets, the experts were wrong; by late 2003, the exchange rate stood at €1 = $1.25. For Volkswagen, which made cars in Germany and exported them to the United States, the fall in the value of the dollar against the euro during 2003 was devastating. To understand what happened, consider a Volkswagen Jetta built in Germany for export to the United States. Volkswagen could have insured against this adverse movement in exchange rates by entering the foreign exchange market in late 2002 and buying a forward contract for dollars at an exchange rate of around $1 = €1 (a forward contract gives the holder the right to exchange one currency for another at some point in the future at a predetermined exchange rate). Called hedging, the financial strategy of buying forward guarantees that at some future point, such as 180 days, Volkswagen would have been able to exchange the dollars it got from selling Jettas in the United States into euros at $1 = €1, irrespective of what the actual exchange rate was at that time. In 2003, such a strategy would have been good for Volkswagen. However, hedging is not without its costs. For one thing, if the euro had declined in value against the dollar, instead of appreciating as it did, Volkswagen would have made even more profit per car in euros by not hedging (a dollar at the end of 2003 would have bought more euros than a dollar at the end of 2002). For another thing, hedging is expensive because foreign exchange dealers will charge a high commission for selling currency forward. Volkswagen decided to hedge just 30 percent of its anticipated U.S. sales in 2003 through forward contracts, rather than the 70 percent it had historically hedged. The decision cost the company more than €1 billion. For 2004, the company reverted back to hedging 70 percent of its foreign currency exposure. Sources: Mark Landler, "As Exchange Rates Swing, Car Makers Try to Duck," The New York Times, January 17, 2004, pp. B1, B4; N. Boudette, "Volkswagen Posts 95% Drop in Net," The Wall Street Journal, February 19, 2004, p. A3; "Volkswagen's Financial Mechanic," Corporate Finance, June 2003, p. 1.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
By entering the foreign exchange market at the end of 2002 and purchasing a forward dollar contract ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these general management questions
-
Three Guys Burgers, Inc., has offered $25.5 million for all of the common stock in Two Guys Fries, Corp. The current market capitalization of Two Guys as an independent company is $20.7 million....
-
The dollar fell to record lows against the euro in April. Over the next month the exchange rate rose because traders began to expect that the Federal Reserve was not going to cut U.S. interest rates...
-
Much of the recent euro currency crisis that struck Europe was attributed to the economy of Greece. George Papandreou, Greeces prime minister, claimed that corruption was at the heart of the crisis....
-
By a work sampling study: Observed Data The machine is being used Proportion of manual labour (machine is running and/or (servicing time) T-% machine is random serviced) Allowance Time Proportion of...
-
Moosier Inc. has been in operation for 3 years and uses the FIFO method of pricing inventory. During the fourth year, Moosier changes to the average-cost method for all its inventory. How will...
-
The following data represent the number of housing starts predicted for the 2nd quarter (April through June) of 2014 for a random sample of 40 economists. (a) Draw a histogram of the data. Comment on...
-
Why is it advisable to obtain a written confession from the subject of an investigation?
-
Crydon, Inc., manufactures an advanced swim fi n for scuba divers. Management is now preparing detailed budgets for the third quarter, July through September, and has assembled the following...
-
Consider a 100-step binomial model where the price of a non-dividend-paying asset at time n, Sn is modelled as Sn = SoZ1 Z2... Zn where Z are i.i.d. random variables with u = 1.05 w. p. p Zi = d =...
-
Orie and Jane, husband and wife, operate a sole proprietorship. They expect their taxable income next year to be $450,000, of which $250,000 is attributed to the sole proprietorship. Orie and Jane...
-
1. Design a synchronous up-down counter that has the following up and down sequences: (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & repeat) and (0, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 & repeat). The counter has a 1-bit control input...
-
Recognizing cash paid for transportation-in costs Blank______. Multiple choice question. increases both the inventory and cash accounts decreases the cash account and increases the inventory account...
-
For each meeting and presentation, written document on the outcomes of the meeting. Note: These written documents must be distributed to the relevant stakeholders. Keep the audience in mind as you...
-
Select all that apply Investments in debt securities may be classified as Multiple select question. available-for-sale securities. current liabilities. equity securities. held-to-maturity securities....
-
Unlike the Stamp Act, I was an external tax (meaning a tax on imports) on items like paper, lead, and glass. I paid the salaries of royal officials. What was the _____________? Unlike the Stamp Act,...
-
This email is poorly written. Read the weaknesses I have listed and what is needed for improvement. Weaknesses: Fails to provide a meaningful subject line. Does not open directly with a statement...
-
What are the two primary objectives of Nevada's Gaming Commission (NGC) and its Gaming Control Board (GCB)? What are the responsibilities of the Gaming Control Board's Audit Division?
-
Fred Farmer needs to prepare a balance sheet for his bank. He spent the day getting the following information. Fred needs your help to build a balance sheet and evaluate it. The information was...
-
Given that (x) * h(x) = g(X), show that after shifting one of the functions an amount x 0 , we get (x - x 0 ) * h(x) = g(X - x 0 ).
-
Light from a laboratory sodium lamp has two strong yellow components at 589.592 3 nm and 588.995 3 nm. How far apart in the first-order spectrum will these two lines be on a screen 1.00 m from a...
-
Examine the three graphs in Fig. P. 11.20 and explain whats being illustrated. Discuss how the shape of g(X) arises. Why is g(X) symmetrical about X = 0? Whats the significance of the width of g(x)?...
-
To explore how student project groups develop through various stages. INSTRUCTIONS 1. Think about the last time you were assigned to a student group to complete a course-related project. 2. Next,...
-
To explore which conflict styles students would use in a variety of workplace scenarios. INSTRUCTIONS 1. Read each of the following workplace scenarios. 2. Next, choose the conflict style being used...
-
The chapter included a paragraph on restaurant managers and staff communication about COVID-19 policies and practices. What would constitute transparency in the downward and upward directions? Data...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App