Walker received $500,000$ and signed a compromise agreement on the understanding that he did

not discuss the issues in relation to the Trust. However, he claimed that he was $$forced$$ to do so$.$

Do you think he was morally defensible to expose the details to BBC and the public? Discuss his

decision from the perspective of utilitarianism and deontology and present your conclusive view

whether he is morally defensible.

$2.$ Professor Lewis suggested a more radical approach to change the culture of the Trust. Assume you

are a top communication officer of the Trust and are responsible for rebuilding the culture. Present

a paper to the board to discuss what values should be fostered and what elements can be used to

strengthen the values. You should also explain why the values are important and what actions can

be done to create the cultural elements to drive out the culture of fear.