Question: We found that there is no consensus as to is parole and probation officers should be armed or unarmed. This varies by agency, state, federal
We found that there is no consensus as to is parole and probation officers should be armed or unarmed. This varies by agency, state, federal vs, state level, juvenile vs. adult supervision, etc. In this assignment, provide the following:
1) List 5 advantages involved when investing parole / probation officers with the authority to carry firearms when on duty
2) List 5 disadvantages involved if parole / probation officers are given the authority to carry firearms when on duty.
3) Are there any overt community relations and/or public perception concern of parole / probation officers when armed?
4) Should only certain parole / probation officers be armed? If so, who and why?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Advantages of ParoleProbation Officers Carrying Firearms Officer Safety Arming paroleprobation officers enhances their personal safety and provides a means of selfdefense in potentially dangerous situ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
