1. What facts would the State rely on to convince the judge these statements are admissible?
2. What legal arguments/constitutional issues would the State argue are applicable to allow the statements to be admitted?
3. What facts would the Defense rely on to convince the judge the statements are not admissible?
4. What legal arguments/constitutional issues would the Defense argue before the court to prevent to Simpsons statements from being admitted?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Facts the State Might Rely On Voluntariness of Statements The state may argue that Simpsons statements were made voluntarily and without coercion They ... View the full answer