What Has This Meant for a Icon? In 2014, news feeds went wild with the announcement that Tim Hortons and Burger King were merging. But what has this meant for such a visible icon of Canada? When the merger was first announced, one of the more immediate concerns was what would happen to staff at both companies. Burger King, a subsidiary of a private Brazilian equity firm that has cut jobs at other companies when mergers have occurred, caused employees to question their future with Tim Hortons. Furthermore, shareholders were also concerned that there would be pressure on individual franchisees to cut corners and that executive pay would be excessive. From previous mergers done by the same company including Heinz and Labatt, cost reductions did occur to make the companies more profit able. Furthermore, the company's stated commitment to maintain staff levels at Tim Hortons only applied to the 16 corporate-owned restaurants. Other critics say that food items at both stores will become interchangeable, thereby reducing the need for separate distribution systems or separate physical locations. Revenues at Canadian Burger King restaurants were low, whereas Tim Hortons outlets were highly profitable. As such, there was some concern that any sharing of products would reduce the attraction consumers have for Tim Hortons, making it less profitable So what did happen? In early 2015, about 350 employees lost their jobs at Tim Hortons, Terminated employees were mainly from its headquarters and regional offices. Later that same year, I analyst noted that Tim Hortons had been able to cut costs and increase expansion to the US marketplace, neither of which would have occurred without the merger. In 2017, Tim Hortons Canadian franchisees formed an association and filed class action lawsuits against the master franchisor, accusing the head office of misusing advertising funds and hiking the prices of products they buy through the company, such as sugar and bacon. Then in early 2018, it was determined that there had been slower than anticipated store growth for the coffee and doughnut chain across North America over the past few years. As well the Tim Hortons brand was engulfed by negative publicity in 2018 after some of its Ontario franchisees cut employee benefits and paid breaks in response to the provinces minimum wage hikes. At the time, its owner, Restaurant Brands International Inc., said the actions did not reflect the brand and blamed a rogue group of franchisees Clearly, the merger of 2 big brands has not been a smooth or simple process. It will be interesting to track the ongoing progress and profitability of Tim Hortons, to monitor which other major restaurant chains merge in the future, and to evaluate the success of these transactions Sources: Adapted from Show, Restaurant Brandum Company Download cial Post February 12, 2016. essed April 23. 2018. hebusiness francopost.com poste store sales for the harrow Jones Cowan, Why For Owner om Hortons Canadian Business May 6, 2016 April 23, 2018 www.canadurbusiness.com.bd.com why foreign ownership has been wreat for tim horton Tim Horton Commit ut 250 PL This Week The Canadian Press January 29, 2015. A 23.2011 people involls this week Tim Hortons over by Burger King May Be Bedford News October 2014 cesed April 22, 2018 www.cbc.ca/business hortoret over by bebedor canada sty 1281802 andare Sturgronmoto Coffee Comuna Burger King Goals ober10 2014 cessed on 23, 2016. Wews.ch/166.hotococomburger Questions: 1. What are the pros and cons when 2 major restaurant chains merge? 2. What are the HRM implications of this type of merger? 3. What, if any, significant changes to operations at Tim Hortons have you noticed since the merger?