what is a good relpy for this answer "Hello everyone, If a 90% tax is imposed on payrolls exceeding $100 million, team payroll distributions would likely shift to be more compressed, with fewer teams surpassing the threshold, resulting in a more normal distribution and a downward shift in the center. The spread would decrease as high-spending teams cut back to avoid heavy taxation, leading to less disparity in payrolls. In my opinion, this system could promote competitive balance by providing poorer teams with funds to improve their rosters, which might enhance overall excitement in games. However, it could discourage wealthy teams from investing heavily in talent, potentially diminishing the quality of play. While financial equity is important, ensuring that teams can still attract top players is crucial for the sport's long-term health. Ultimately, the approach could foster closer competition, but the impact on team investment and talent acquisition must be carefully evaluated