What is the correct answer?

Moving to another question will save this response. >> Question 13 5 points Save Answer A study was conducted to determine whether magnets were effective in treating pain. The values represent measurements of pain using the visual analog scale. Assume that both samples are independent simple random samples from populations having normal distributions. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than the pain reductions for those treated with magnets. What is the conclusion for this hypothesis test? n X S Sham 20 0.43 1.57 Magnet 20 0.49 0.91 A. Reject HO. There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets. B. Reject HO. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets. O C. Fail to reject HO. There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets. D. Fail to reject HO. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets