What is the three$-$part test used to evaluate if a workplace rule or standard is justified $($as a bona fide occupational requirement$)?$

Question $2$ options:

Once the complainant shows that a standard is discriminatory, the employer must prove $(1)$ that there is a logical connection between the test and the performance of the job; $(2)$ that the test was adopted since the standard was economical; and $(3)$ that the standard is reasonably efficient at accomplishing the employer's legitimate purpose.

Once the complainant shows that a standard is discriminatory, the employer must prove $(1)$ that there is a rational connection between the test and the performance of the job; $(2)$ that the test was adopted under an honest and good$-$faith belief that the standard was necessary; and $(3)$ that the standard is reasonably necessary to accomplish the employer's legitimate purpose.

Once the complainant shows that a standard is discriminatory, the employer must prove $(1)$ that there is a rational connection between the test and the performance of the job; $(2)$ that the test was adopted under an honest belief that the standard was fair; and $(3)$ that the standard is reasonably necessary in accommodating the employee's needs.

Once the complainant shows that a standard is discriminatory, the employer must prove $(1)$ that there is a logical connection between the test and the performance of the job; $(2)$ that the test was adopted because it was subjectively necessary; and $(3)$ that the standard is required to accomplish the employer's legitimate purpose.