What was the court's CONCLUSION $($holding$,$ decision$)$ in the Sogetti USA $v$ Scariano case?

For Scariano. Express consent of an employee is required before contractual rights can be assigned to$,$ and enforced by$,$ a successor company.

For Scariano. Express consent of an employee is not required when employer rights are assigned to a a successor company.

For Sogeti. Express consent of an employee is not required before contractual rights can be assigned to or enforced by a successor company.

For Sogeti. Express consent of all employees is required prior to assignment of an employer's contractual rights