When using the justification that "the tactic was unavoidable," the negotiator is saying that:

Select one:

A$.$ the negotiator was not in full control of his or her actions and hence should not be held responsible.

B$.$ the tactic helped to avoid greater harm.

C$.$ what the negotiator did was really trivial and not very significant.

D$.$ the quality of the tactic should be judged by its consequences.

The concept of "duty ethics" states that:

Select one:

A$.$ the rightness of an action is based on the customs and norms of a particular society or community

B$.$ the rightness of an action is determined by evaluating the pros and cons of its consequences.