While shopping in Dand's Grocery Store (Dans), Fat approached a display of glass jars of jam The jars were stacked from waist height to six or seven feet from the ground, and the rows were separated by corrugated cardboard. The display was unreasonably dangerous, being both too high and too precariously constructed. Pat decided to buy a few jars. Realizing that she needed to be careful in order not to knock over the display, Pat slowly began to pull the first jar out. Just before the jar was completely out, the display began to shake, and Pat stopped pulling out the jar. She was about to push it back into the stack when Bob, another shopper, accidentally bumped his cart into Pat. This caused her hand to jolt forward, and the entire display fell over. Both Pat and Bob were knocked down and suffered glass cuts. Pat goes Dan's for negligence in designing and constructing the display. Pat has also named Bob as a defendant. If Dan's claims Pat was comparatively negligent, and the jurisdiction maintains a rule of pure comparative fault, Explain the correct statement which should be accurate for this scenario?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

In a jurisdiction that follows a rule of pure comparative fa... View the full answer