Question: Why is Expected Shortfall ( ES ) considered more risk - averse than Value at Risk ( VaR ) ? a . ES accounts for

Why is Expected Shortfall (ES) considered more risk-averse than Value at Risk (VaR)?
a. ES accounts for the severity of losses beyond the VaR threshold.
b. ES focuses only on the highest potential losses.
c. ES is easier to calculate than VaR.
d. ES uses a more conservative confidence level.
 Why is Expected Shortfall (ES) considered more risk-averse than Value at

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Finance Questions!