Why the term "assembler language" is not quite correct? $($ ref. Ch $1\mathrm{.}1\mathrm{.}1)$

Group of answer choices

Assembler $$language$$ is not a high$-$level language such as C$++$ and Java, which is a

low$-$level language that use by users to write computer programs that can be

directly executed by a computer$$s CPU.

Assembly language is just a low$-$level programming language that provides symbols that the

computer can understand for the machine to execute. It is not a separate language for

computing, but simply an easy$-$to$-$read expression.

The term assembler language is not quite correct because it means that this language is

complete when it is actually a lower division programming language made up of

mnemonic instructions and machine language instructions. This means that assembler

doesn$$t have all the perks upper level languages have like functions and variables.

Assembler language is a type of low$-$level programming language that is

used to write programs that are executed directly by a computer's central

processing unit $($CPU$).$ The term "assembler language" is not quite correct

because it is not a true programming language, but rather a set of

mnemonics that correspond to the machine code instructions of a

particular CPU

An assembler is a utility program that converts source code programs from assembly language into machine language.

A more correct term is "assembly language".