with $0\mathrm{.}2$ ; and History, with $0\mathrm{.}1.$

a$)$ Using the weighted factor$-$rating method, which country would you select?

In the following table, compute the total weighted score for each candidate $($enter your responses rounded to one decimal place$).$

$\backslash$table$[[\backslash$table$[[$Selection Criterion$],[($Risk Factors$)]],\backslash$table$[[$Criteria$],[$Weight$]],$England,Canada$],[$Price of service from outsourcer,$0\mathrm{.}10,4,1],[$Nearness of facilities to client,$0\mathrm{.}60,1,3],[$Level of technology,$0\mathrm{.}20,1,2],[$History of successful outsourcing,$0\mathrm{.}10,4,1],[$Total Weighted Score:,,,$]]$

Based on a comparison of weighted risk scores, Claudia Pragram should choose as the best country for outsourcing.

b$)$ Double each of the weights used in part $($a$)($to $0\mathrm{.}20,1\mathrm{.}20,0\mathrm{.}40,$ and $0\mathrm{.}20,$ respectively$).$

If each weight is doubled, Claudia Pragram should choose as the best country for outsourcing.

What effect does doubling the weights have on your answer?

A$.$ The conclusion does not change but the weighted averages change.

B$.$ The conclusion does not change since the weighted averages do not change at all.

C$.$ The conclusion changes but the weighted averages do not change at all.

D$.$ The conclusion changes since the weighted averages change.