With limited capital for this project, the factory considered purchasing a refurbished system directly from the manufacturer
Question:
With limited capital for this project, the factory considered purchasing a refurbished system directly from the manufacturer or utilizing shared imaging’s DI revolution solution over a 60 month period.
Using NPV(Net Present Value) comparative cost analysis, analyze both procurement options to determine which option was the most profitable over the asset’s lifespan. The hospital determined the required rate of return for this project was 3,25 %.
Purchasing a refurbished system directly from the manufacturer cost (60 months) | |
description | cost |
MR system maintenance (monthly) | 12500$ |
yearly software/coil enhancement | 50000$ |
1.5 OEM factory refurbed wide-bore MRI system | 1000000$ |
Utilizing shared imaging's DI revolution solution (60 month) | |
description | cost |
share image monthly FS charge | 28000$ |
Statistics for Business and Economics
ISBN: 978-0132930192
8th edition
Authors: Paul Newbold, William Carlson, Betty Thorne