Would an effort by Goofus to modify a written and signed agreement for the sale of the collection to Gallant based on a draft preliminary agreement which excluded certain stamps from the sale be successful? $$A$.$ Yes, because the parol evidence rule only prohibits the use of preliminary negotiations to interpret oral contractsB. Yes, because the parol evidence rule permits the use of preliminary negotiations to interpret written contracts $$C$.$ No$,$ because the parol evidence rule prohibits the use of preliminary negotiations to interpret written contractsD. No$,$ because the parol evidence rule prohibits the use of post$-$contract behavior to interpret written contracts