Question: Would Wikipedia be a good source to cite for a scholarly paper? Why or why not? Hint: Consider primary (as opposed to secondary) sources when

  1. Would Wikipedia be a good source to cite for a scholarly paper? Why or why not? Hint: Consider primary (as opposed to secondary) sources when conducting research
  2. How has Wikipedia evolved to address some of the characteristics of High-Quality Information (See the characteristics of high-quality information below); Can you provide some examples?
  3. Could we apply some of the tools and materials from class to analyze the online, encyclopedia business? What might this look like?
  4. What could be the future of Wikipedia? What might it look like?
  5. How are new Wikipedia entries vetted for information quality and relevance?
  6. What could Wikipedia do to help perpetuate competitive advantage and viability in the long run? How could AI help Wikipedia?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!