write a comment to this discussion my class mate wrote. After reading the Prudential v. Dewey case, it seems the court's ruling was pretty solid, sticking to established legal doctrines. The claims against Dewey and Haight were valid, considering their direct involvement and potential negligence. While the summary judgment for Gilmartin makes sense due to the lack of direct contractual relationship or privity. The court's emphasis on the reasonableness of Prudential's settlement and including those costs as damages also aligns with legal standards. Acknowledging the direct financial impact of the error.To mitigate similar errors it's clear that rigorous proofreading, cross-referencing, and a strong attention to detail are essential. Implementing checklists, utilizing software checks, and escalating any uncertainties to an attorney are crucial preventative strategies. This case highlights the critical importance of accuracy and thorough review in legal work. Emphasizing the professional responsibility to prevent negligence and its subsequent legal liabilities. Clear communication and a heightened awareness of detail are crucial for paralegals to minimize risks and ensure accurate legal documentation