write a response with recent peer reviewed articles for this discussion post: My Doctoral Study examines how senior executives and crisismanagement leaders in mid-sized technology organizations integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into crisis response to reduce reputational and financial risk. The intended contribution is a practiceready typology of substantive CSRincrisis strategies (e.g., preauthorized relief triggers, equitable allocation criteria, multilingual transparency protocols) that leaders can embed in incident playbooks and governance reviews. This focus is grounded in my prospectus and emerging interview corpus, which frames CSR integration as a gap with tangible risk implications for technology organizations. Recent evidence associates robust CSR with financial resilience in shocks, reputational buffering during societal crises, and strengthened organizational capabilitiessuggesting that codifying how executives operationalize CSR under stress can improve decision quality and stakeholder outcomes (Eng et al., 2024; Jin et al., 2024; Lu et al., 2024; Ma et al., 2024; Rolf, 2023). Scholarpractitioner process and rigor As an independent scholar, I align a qualitative, pragmatic inquiry with reflexive thematic analysis to construct meaningbased themes from leaders' accounts, supported by a transparent audit trail and crosscase patterning. This approach makes the interpretive labor visible while maintaining analytic traction for managerial use