Write a summery about this article Scienti c Argumentation Model (SAM): A Heuristic for Reading Research Articles by Science Students

and full fill these criterias.

Section Descri tion Points Points p Possible Received Purpose . . . . . . . . . Explicitiy state the relationship that the authors were examining and why they were examining it. 4 Methods This should be a step-by-step of how the authors conducted their study. This is often important information to consider 4 when examining the limitations and considering the validity of the study. Findings Simply put, what did they find? Were their hypotheses supported? Did they find something strange or unexpected in 4 their results? Limitations What do the authors identify as limitations to their study? This is also helpful when considering the validity of the 4 article. SAM evaluation Did you find it helpful? Have you had this introduced to you in previous courses by other instructors? Does it make reading research articles easier