You are a mid-level management consultant working for the top tier global consulting firm McKinsey & Co. You have been engaged by a private equity client that has acquired a firm in a sector they have limited knowledge of. The client has identified a new CEO they wish to install in the firm with extensive sector knowledge but are concerned about CEOs leadership approach. The new CEO has some professional colleagues that already work in the sector and feel it would be inappropriate to conduct primary research within the sector as the new CEO would likely find out about their concerns and may choose to not accept the new position. If the CEOs leadership style is appropriate then the client has nothing to worry about, but if on the other hand their leadership approach is less suitable then they want to know what to look out for and what alternative leadership approach would be best. suited. 

Examine the suitability of the Psychodynamic approach to leadership in the independent boutique luxury hotel sector.

How effective do you believe this approach would be and what impact would this have on the overall performance of the organization? Provide evidence and examples to support your argument.

What potential warning signs should management be aware of that could be sign of employee and organizational distress? Provide evidence and examples to support your argument.

Suggest a more suitable leadership or alternative approach that you feel would be more relevant to the given context. Provide evidence and examples to support your argument.