You are creating a mobile application that will allow financial users to promote interests of their own. The application will allow a user to create a $$circle$$ which is a section for a specific interest $($say trading, investing, cryptos, foreign exchange, etc.$),$ and have other users join his circle.

The application should allow the creator of the circle to maintain content on the circle$$s main page and to allow users to join the circle. It should allow for circle users to communicate using a forum, and to post events, which circle users can sign up for.

Create wireframes for this mobile application. Requirements:

$$ Use a wireframing tool of your choice from PowerPoint to Figma The quality of the design and use of the tool will count for.

$$ The screen dimension will be the one of an iPhone $14/15$ Pro $(393$ x $852).$

$$ Create a navigation diagram. It will consist of a box for each page and arrows among pages to show navigation. The label on each arrow will indicate the link the user clicks on to go to the target page.

$$ Design the pages to cover the following functionality:

$1.$ Dashboard that shows the different circles

$2.$ Create circle

$3.$ Circle home page

$4.$ Join circle

$5.$ Forum

$6.$ Post event

$7.$ View event

$8.$ Signup for an event

$9.$ Additional page of your choice $($other than login$,$ forgot password, etc.$)$

$10.$ Additional page of your choice $($other than login$,$ forgot password, etc.$)$

$$ All pages include a header that includes the logo and other relevant elements.

$$ Include data you feel is appropriate to make the application seem real.

$$

Deliverables:

$$ Navigation diagram

$$ Concept description

$$ Page designs

$$ A writeup listing at least $4$ metaphors you included and where you used them.

$$ A writeup listing at least $4$ layout concepts you applied and where you used them.

$$ A writeup listing at least $4$ navigation patterns you used and where you used them.

$$ A writeup listing at least $4$ gestures patterns you used and where you used them.

$$ Presentation

Evaluation Criteria:

$$ Design completeness $5$ pts

$$ Overall design quality $-5$pts

$$ Good analysis of the concept $5$pts

$$ Navigation diagram $2$ pts

$$ Proper use of Metaphors $2$ pts

$$ Proper use of layout concepts $2$ pts

$$ Proper use of Navigation patterns $2$ pts

$$ Proper use of gestures $2$pts

$$ Quality of presentation in class $/$ video of your presentation if you cannot attend. $5$ pts

$$

Grading Scale

$100\%$

Perfect Work: Mastery of project learning outcomes. Requirements of assignment are satisfied through artful use of theory$/$skills to produce an innovative submission at a level that exceeds industry standards.

$95\%$

Rare Work: Rare comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of assignment are satisfied through expert use of theory$/$skills to produce a nuanced and original submission that meets industry standards.

$90\%$

Outstanding Work: Outstanding comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of assignment are satisfied through the use of theory$/$skills to produce a highly original submission that meets industry standards

$85\%$

Exceptional Work: Exceptional comprehension of learning outcomes. Requirements of assignment are satisfied through the use of theory$/$skills to produce an original submission that meets industry standards.

$80\%$

Excellent Work: Excellent comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of assignment are satisfied through the use of theory$/$skills to produce a submission with elements of originality that meets industry standards.

$75\%$

Very Good Work: Thorough comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of assignment are satisfied through the skilled use of theory$/$ techniques to produce high quality student work.

$70\%$

Good Work: Good comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of assignment are satisfied through the skilled use of theory$/$techniques to produce quality student work.

$65\%$

Competent Work: Acceptable comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of the assignment are satisfied with ample skill. Student demonstrates competence at a sufficient level to continue in the program.

$60\%$

Fairly Competent Work: Moderate comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of the assignment are satisfied with some skill.

$55\%$

Passing Work: Passable comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of the assignment are satisfied with limited skill.

$50\%$

Borderline Work: Minimal comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of the assignment are satisfied with marginal skill.

$40\%$

Poor Work: Insufficient effort and$/$or minimal comprehension of project learning outcomes. Requirements of the assignment are not satisfied despite the completion all components.

$<=30\%$

Very Poor Work: Submission is partial and$/$or of poor quality. An incomplete comprehension of project learning outcomes is demonstrated.

$0\%$

No Submission: No work was submitted for review.