You have prepared your initial interview or interrogation questions in the first discussion. You chose a path based on legal and ethical considerations on how to approach questioning the two suspects. Talk about these legal and ethical considerations in more detail here to defend your approach in the application of Reid's Direct Positive Confrontation. 

What approaches did you avoid and why? 

What was your theme development? 

Step 3 is handling denials. After reviewing the suspect information, discuss that approach and explain what you would do and why? Discuss both suspects' actions after reading Reid's Step 3 handling Denials and tell us how you plan to proceed and why. Use your book and cite the reasons why you take your actions? 

Be sure to have started your final paper using the information from this discussion.

 

 

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

In approaching the interview or interrogation process I have considered several legal and ethical considerations to guide my approach and justify the application of Reids Direct Positive Confrontation ... View the full answer