Question: You will write this as a client memorandum. The format should be separate sections for ( 1 ) facts ( 2 ) issue or issues

You will write this as a client memorandum. The format should be separate sections for (1) facts (2)
issue or issues (3) discussion (4) conclusion.
You can borrow my language below for the facts and the issue, or you can phrase it yourself.
The length should be whatever is required to answer the question.
You should use only primary authorities, which are cited within the body of the discussion, either within
a sentence or as a parenthetical reference after the sentence. As an example:
Section 163(a) provides, as a general rule, that all interest paid during the year shall be allowed
as a deduction. Section 163(h)(1) states that no deduction shall be allowed for personal interest.
For this purpose, personal interest does not include any interest paid on qualified residence
debt (Section 163(h)(2)(D)). Qualified residence debt include acquisition debt and home equity
debt (Section 163(h)(3)).
Notice that all of the above references are in Section 163. However you cannot simply cite Section
163 for all of those comments. That does not help a reader to understand what provision supports each
statement. It does not allow a manager or partner in your firm to review your work they would have to
do the research themselves to determine whether your statements are actually found in the law. It
would be similar to a police report saying Witnesses to the crime indicated that a male in light colored
clothing ran from the crime scene. One witness saw the man drop a knife in the bushes as he ran, and
another witness saw him drive away in a blue van. These statements are not attributed to any specific
witness. Be specific about what part of the law supports each of your statements.
The conclusion should conclude what you have said what is the answer to the issue raised? The
conclusion does NOT introduce new discussion.
The facts are:
Mary and Bill Markson purchased a house in 2011. The Marksons rented this property from June 2011
until August 2014 at which time they occupied the property as their principal residence. The house was
acquired for $300,000 and the Marksons claimed $30,000 of cost recovery deductions during the 38
month rental period. The property was sold in March 2024 for $550,000. The property was used for a
total of 153 months, with the last 115 months of use as the Marksons principal residence.
The issue is:
What amount of gain will be recognized by the Marksons from the sale of this property?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Accounting Questions!