Your boss has been in the software development field for $30$ years. He has always prided himself on his ability to adapt his skills from one approach to developing software to the next approach. For example, he had no problem learning structured analysis and design in the early $1980$s and information engineering in the early $1990$s$.$

He even understands the advantage of rapid application development. But the other day, when you and he were talking about the advantages of object$$oriented approaches, he became totally confused. He thought that characteristics such as polymorphism and inheritance were an advantage for object$$oriented systems. However, when you explained the problems with inheritance conflicts, redefinition capabilities, and the need for semantic consistency across different implementations of methods, he was ready to simply give up$.$

To make matters worse, you then went on to explain the importance of contracts in controlling the development of the system. At this point in the conservation, he basically threw in the towel. As he walked off, you heard him say something like $$I guess it's true, it's too hard to teach an old dog new tricks.$$

$$Being a loyal employee and friend, you decided to write a short tutorial to give your boss on object$$oriented systems development.

As a first step, create a detailed outline for the tutorial.

As a subtle example, use good design criteria, such as coupling and cohesion, in the design of your tutorial outline.

Which aspects of object$-$oriented software development are missing and why do you

Which portion of your peer's outline would you replace with your recommendations if there were a time constraint on the tutorial?