Your senior partner, Michael Smith has called you in again relative to another client, Justin Beeber. It turns out that Justin is 16 years old and somewhat wealthy. On a date with his girlfriend Selena Gonzalez (who is 18), the two decided to purchase timeshare together in Hawaii. They located the perfect property while scouring the beaches and orally agreed to purchase the property from a Mrs. Obama who agreed to sell the young couple the time share for $500,000. Said arrangement subsequently was documented on a beach bar napkin with all parties with Mrs. Obama and Justin signing. Later, the young couple realized that purchasing the property was a mistake as they offered way too much for the property. Mrs. Obama argues that the two must follow through on the contract. Presuming that the napkin is a valid writing, is the contract enforceable against Justin Beeber? Why or why not? Presuming that the napkin is a valid writing, is the contract enforceable against Selena Gonzalez? Why or why not? Presuming that the napkin was non-existent but there are witnesses that can testify as the conversations and Mrs. Obama admits in a letter that there was a contract, is the contract enforceable against Selena and/or Justin? Why or why not?  Prepare your minor memo